At 04:26 PM 9/25/2008, you wrote:
>[Marsha]
>There are six senses: sight, hearing, touch, smell, taste and
>mind. Perceptual awareness may be of a mental pattern. These six
>senses of perception seem to cover everything.
>
>[Krimel]
>The number of senses is a bit arbitrary. Them as several senses that get
>lumped under touch: pain, proprioception, balance, and heat to name the
>most obvious. But "mind" is most assuredly not a "sense".
Marsha
You must have missed that when you were studying Buddhism.
[Krimel]
One of the reasons I quit studying Buddhism is that I value clear thinking.
Krimel,
Okay, I thought you were passing yourself off as a sock puppet who
had studied Buddhism. Or does the fact that Case called you his sock
puppet, and you, Krimel, claimed to have studied Buddhism warrant
special consideration.
Here is a review:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayatana
I think defining the senses as six is more compatible with this
statement from LILA
"The Metaphysics of Quality subscribes to what is called empiricism.
It claims that all legitimate human knowledge arises from the senses
or by thinking about what the senses provide. "
Marsha
.
.
Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
