[Ham] It seems that you are contradicting yourself here. An uncreated absolute source has no beginning or ending by definition.
[Krimel] This is a fundamental error. You claim that the idea of ex nihilo fit is a major big deal. You insist that it is such a powerful logical principle that you are willing to dismiss the physicists' inquiries into ontology on the basis of this principle. But just you seek to set aside ex nihilo fit through a word game. You claim to be able to "define" it away. Your source does nothing, explains nothing. It just acts as intellectual spackling compound to cover the huge hole in your thinking. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
