Andre:
Thank you for responding Woods, but maybe I haven't made myself clear Had
you seen my response to Platt?
I'm not suggesting this to happen overnight..I'm not even suggesting that
this scenario *should* happen. What I am suggesting is that the MoQ provides
us with a "rational" basis to argue for an improvement of the world we live
in based on quality ( and not the size of our bank accounts). i.e. openness
to respond to DQ when- and wherever needed. I am not making myself any
illusions..I have been "around" for awhile.
This will take a long time and education will play an important role in this
process. So long as we recognise the need for discussion, call it
"diplomacy" there is hope. At least 15 generations I said
woods:
Ok, thanks for clarifying. As you well may know, I'm having serious
trust issues so you'll have to excuse me. I know the U.S. is having serious
trust issues in segments of our society. So you see I needed this
clarification.
thanks.
woods
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
