Ian:
Of course I don't. That was my point .... when the constitution was
drawn up it was a reasonable precaution ... a right worth defending.
Like everything (as in everything) rights evolve and need
re-interpretation ...
woods:
When rights evolve you don't re-interpretate the U.S. constitution, if
you didn't know. The constitution provides a process in which the U.S.
constitution can be changed/amended. We are not to re-interpret and
twist the Constitution in accord to our current cultural whims. A process
of critical thinking and debate is to occur in all 50 states and then the
constitution can be changed.
Do you see the difference?
Ian:
If we had a tyrannical government to deal with ... we'd need to think
about how to deal with it ... the right to deal with it (using
necessary force) is the constitutional point. Worth using our brains
too.
woods:
a point I don't think anybody in this forum would deny.
thanks.
woods
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
