[Woods]
Small armed groups can last for some time as long as they can find
homage somewhere still. It depends on how much a big army wants to
go all out in their pursuits of warfare obviously. If they wanted to
bomb all over the place, then it would most definitely be difficult
to last under those conditions.
[Arlo]
In Iraqi insurgency is armed with military grade weaponry. Tell me,
if you believe a handful of hunters could indeed make some type of
stand against an invading army, and you find this to be a basis for
the right of gun ownership, then do you favor arming our citizens
with military weaponry? Wouldn't that make their ability to stand
against an encroaching army more probable? I mean, if we arm our
citizens to protect us from invasions, then why arm them with only
pea-shooters and pop-guns? Why not arm them with assault weapons,
bazookas and flamethrowers?
For what its worth, should an invading army occupy America, it will
only be by securing military weapons (on the blackmarket, or smuggled
in via a supportive nation) that any line of defense we have will
stand (assuming our army has already been beaten). This is what is
happening in Iraq. It is not a bunch of hunters and handgun owners
holding off the American army.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
