Bo has said:
I have previously claimed that the MOQ is the system that contains the
MOQ*), no 5th static level that so many keep harping on yet something
beyond the 4th. level, but haven't really used the "code of art beyond
intellect" that Pirsig speaks about to promote the SOL interpretation.
Maybe Platt has (he is the aesthetician) but I haven't paid enough
attention. Anyway, you Andrè has made this connection. Great!
*) "Containing itself" is possible (the congruity theorem) while the
smaller container containing the bigger is impossible.
Ron:
Hello Bo,
It is possible, just inaccurate. What is this "congruity theorem"
can you provide a link to it? thanks.
I googled it and came up with nothing.
The code of art or aestetics Pirsig defines as the "good"
How do we know what is good? Pirsig defines the "good"
as Quality.
Quality, he says, is dynamic.
He states that the good or Quality is defined by 4 static levels.
4 static levels and the good or Quality they define.
Exactly what that good is in universal terms is impossible to define
because it is contingent on the 4 static levels .
The 4 static levels combine in infinite variety.
therefore the code of art is infinitly defineable.
the code of art being infinitly definable does not
allow itself to be universally defined.
A code of art or Quality that may not be absolutly defined is a "dynamic
Quality" or a dynamic code of art.
A dynamic code of art is, a dynamic quality.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
