Ron: NOW for the BIG questions:
Andre: Hi Ron, I noticed that Steve has already anwered your questions, and I agree with his observations (please note I am not the expert and continue experiencing this MoQ as never ending..... .). 1: )?? IS the "code of ART" a product of static Quality? Andre: Pirsig identifies this code as Dynamic morality. It is not a product of static Quality. I tend to feel that static quality is our intuited (rather than strictly 'intellectuallised') interpretation/conceptualisation/reflection of this Dynamic morality. 2:) If so, does it require a level? or is it to be known as Dynamic Quality? Andre: No and yes. I stand corrected but DQ pervades. It unifies. It is the One. You can see it as a level but only to suggest that it is the most important. Without DQ...nothing. Ron, to be honest: I am reluctant to say anything about this code, for the same reason Pirsig doesn't want to say much about Quality. For what is is worth. Regards Andre Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
