Hi Steve --



Quality as a monism is an intellectual postulate. You can accept it and see where it takes you, or you can leave it be. This forum is concerned with seeing where this intellectual postulate takes us. If you are unwilling to accept it for the sake of argument and at least try to understand what Pirsig means by it then your posts will be of little interest to most people here.

In other words, if your arguments took the form "if we accept this postulate it leads to these problems" then I would be interested in the discussion. But yours always take the form "I don't want to accept this postulate because that is just not how I understand the term value." You are playing a different game than the other members of this forum. There is just nothing to say to someone who is not interested in Pirsig's Quality.

My interest in the MoQ is longstanding, largely because my philosophy also has a valuistic premise. I think I do understand what Pirsig means by Quality, and have made a sincere attempt to accept it as a metaphysical "monism". Unfortunately, for reasons that I've cited, the Quality thesis falls short of this distinction. This is not just because the author has distorted the meaning of "value", or that the terms "dynamic" and "static" are contraposed. My criticism is not about semantics. Rather, it concerns the flawed epistemology that an aesthetic sensibility such as "beauty", "importance", "quality" or "value" can stand independently as the ultimate reality.

While this criticism may be outside of your personal ballpark, I believe it has a legitimate place in a forum dedicated to a "free-ranging discussion" of the problems and applications of RMP's Metaphysics of Quality. Your complaint is duly noted, Steve. If I have overstepped my bounds, I shall of course abide by the house rules.

Regards,
Ham


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to