Hi MP: > > From: MarshaV > > 208 "The MOQ would add a fourth stage where the term "God" is > > completely dropped as a relic of an evil social suppression of > > intellectual and Dynamic freedom. The MOQ is not just atheistic in > > this regard. It is anti-theistic." > > MP: Thanks for those, Marsha. > > The one that I think most caught my eye was the one above. The question I > think that needs to be asked of adherents of MoQ is: Does the MoQ's > anti- > theistic nature demand anti-theistic responses to theism in seeking > Quality in a > theistic world? Is anti-theism the way to covercome theism in an MoQ > approach > just because the MoQ is itself anti-theistic? > > My current feeling is no; it does not demand it, and in fact IMO (see my > last post > about superstion in baseball) anti-theism in a theistic context is > anti-quality in > from an MoQ POV.
I agree. If someone finds value in believing in God, leprechauns or a rabbit's foot, who is to say they are wrong other than those who believe everyone should believe what they believe and try to force their beliefs on others by ridicule, intimidation or at the point of a gun? Freedom to believe is just as much a value as freedom to choose. Platt Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
