> dmb says: > And so what is the mystical experience, exactly? Well, you can't say > in advance what it will be like. That's what makes it fresh and > original. That's what makes it Dynamic as opposed to static. That's > what makes it ineffable and, like mel was saying in connection with > Taoism and Judaism, why the divine cannot be named. > > Enlightenment is different for every person. They are, so to speak, tailor > made for > each person and so it totally depends on who you are, where you are > and when you are. It'll present itself in such a way as to be > meaningful for you. So it's not a singular or specific event. It's > more like a category of experience. >
MP: I read this and only become more confused as to how you can reject theism as defined in its most inclusive definition (as I use it.) On the one hand you reject theism's meirts outright when I refer to it, and yet here essentially laud the very beauty/simplicity of thesim in that very definition I use. What gives? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
