Hey Ham, > With all due respect to Pirsig, he has presented us with a conundrum. He > suggests a term for the fundamental metaphysical reality that, by his own > admission, cannot -- indeed, MUST not -- be defined, although it is > existentially understood to be man's sense of the relative value, > significance or worth of an experience. > > Any batters on the MD team willing to take a swing at that?
By making a split between "sense of value" and experience you have thrown a hanging curve ball. That pitch, my friend, is your good old subject/object worldview you predictably throw every time. An MOQ batter is waiting for that pitch, knowing really is no distinction between value and experience. To the MOQ batter they are one and the same. Consequently your pitch is a fat softball. Whamo -- out of the park. But, who's keeping score? :-) Warm regards, Platt Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
