Ham said:
With all due respect to Pirsig, he has presented us with a conundrum.  He 
suggests a term for the fundamental metaphysical reality that, by his own 
admission, cannot -- indeed, MUST not -- be defined, although it is 
existentially understood to be man's sense of the relative value, significance 
or worth of an experience.


dmb says:I posted quite a lot about why Dynamic Quality can't be defined 
earlier today. As you'll be able to see from that, hopefully, it is a 
mischaracterization to call DQ "the fundamental metaphysical reality". It's not 
quite right to think of it as "man's sense" either. Pirsig's own phrase, "the 
primary empirical reality" characterizes it pretty well. But calling it a 
"fundamental metaphysical reality" gives it an a priori, ontological status, a 
claim that is avoided by calling it an empirical reality. To put it in the 
simplest terms, DQ is experience itself, an event, and not a thing. This 
empirical event is characterized as primary because it is the first and most 
basic kind of experience, the cutting edge of every moment. This is why it 
can't be defined. It's what you know ahead of definitions. And finally, it 
can't rightly be understood as limited to man's sense of value because DQ is 
the force by which we evolved, predates us by forever, and extends to the 
experience of every living creature and beyond. See, the MOQ is radically 
empirical. It says experience is reality. This is not to say that reality is 
the thing we experience or that it is encountered in experience. I mean, the 
primary empirical reality has to be understood outside of the subject-object 
framework.

 
_________________________________________________________________
It’s the same Hotmail®. If by “same” you mean up to 70% faster. 
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_AE_Same_022009
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to