> > Marsha to Platt:Hmmmm. Quantum Theory is based on chance? I thought it > acknowledged uncertainty, but chance? By chance do you mean a dynamic > spontaneity? > > > dmb says: > William James said "chance" was just an insulting name for "freedom". A > flattering name for freedom is "dynamic spontaneity". This idea of a > random, meaningless universe ruled by chance is mechanistic, materialistic > universe but the MOQ doesn't paint it that way at all. The notion that > even subatomic particles express preferences implies that some level of > consciousness, however limited, has always been a feature of reality. The > process of evolution is guided from within, so to speak. The unfolding of > the physical universe as well as the biological, social and intellectual > course of evolution proceeds on the basis of quality decisions. It goes > all the way down. That's not "God" and that's not random chance either. > > Thus, the "ooops" objection, which Platt has used 100 times, does not > apply to the MOQ.
Now you're talking. "Consciousness always a feature of reality." I hope Krimel is listening. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
