Platt, Interesting comment, when I think of chance in this capacity I think that chance is limited by the form it takes, therefore it is not totally random per-say but guided on the contigent of the form it manifests in, the form it manifests in being contingent on limited possibility of chance.
Physicists have noted how particles oscillate into and out of existence, anomaloies of a field. -Ron ________________________________ From: Platt Holden <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2009 8:36:45 AM Subject: Re: [MD] Question? > Greetings! > > I am wondering what is the relationship between Quantum Theory and > the Theory of Evolution. Are they both science? Is there a > particular ontological assumption underlying each that is the > same? Different? > > It would be okay to tell me my questions make no sense whatsoever > because... > Marsha Hey Marsha, Both quantum theory and evolution depend on the assumption that chance has creative power. Compare to the MOQ assumption that DQ has creative power, or to the theist's assumption that God has creative power. Platt Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
