Andre On 7 March:
DMB had said to Andre: > > I hope that helps. I really do. Andre: > It does dmb and thank you for this. To give Bodvar credit, he is > certainly committed and has the integrity of the MoQ at heart. And the > other thing is that he is consistent and has been so over the years. I > have not the understanding of the MoQ to the extent he suggests he has. > I really am convinced that before you can play with something you have > to understand it completely. Once you know this you can become creative > (and perhaps develop new insights). I am not there yet with regards to > the MoQ, not by a long shot.Bodvar has to account for these himself. You seem torn between DMB and me. Hope you don't develop schizo ... something ;-) > There are some questions I have put to Bodvar that are still hanging. Er.... I may have overlooked some posts in the recent flood. What were the questions? > In the mean time, I keep on going over the static MoQ (ZMM, Lila etc,) > in my attempt to integrate it with my own q experiences and > reflections. And rest assured, Pirsig (and McWatt) remain the > authority for me. > The MoQ is a wonderful thing and through this discuss and contributors > such as yourself, Platt, Bodvar,Ron, Marsha and many others (past and > present) we will develop the MoQ in the process of living it. Wish I was as nice and polite as you. Bodvar Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
