dmb to Andre: I hope that helps. I really do.
Andre: It does dmb and thank you for this. To give Bodvar credit, he is certainly committed and has the integrity of the MoQ at heart. And the other thing is that he is consistent and has been so over the years. I have not the understanding of the MoQ to the extent he suggests he has. I really am convinced that before you can play with something you have to understand it completely. Once you know this you can become creative (and perhaps develop new insights). I am not there yet with regards to the MoQ, not by a long shot.Bodvar has to account for these himself. There are some questions I have put to Bodvar that are still hanging. In the mean time, I keep on going over the static MoQ (ZMM, Lila etc,) in my attempt to integrate it with my own q experiences and reflections. And rest assured, Pirsig (and McWatt) remain the authority for me. The MoQ is a wonderful thing and through this discuss and contributors such as yourself, Platt, Bodvar,Ron, Marsha and many others (past and present) we will develop the MoQ in the process of living it. Kind regards Andre Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
