> [Krimel] > I agree completely here. It seems to me that Platt and dmb are attempting > to > read choice and intention into even the inorganic level. I don't see how > this differs from theology in the least. Platt sneers a chance but at > least > acknowledges some kind of vague theological convictions. Dave, just > pretends > that whatever it is he is saying, it is not theology.
Pirsig: "I think the answer (Are atoms aware?) is that inorganic objects experience events but do not react to them biologically socially or intellectually. They react to these experiences inorganically, according to the laws of physics." (LC, 30) Guess that makes Pirsig a theologian. Yeah, right. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
