> Steve wrote: > Personally, I think our society is better off preferring the woman's > right to choose and can instill a value for human life without having > to go to such extremes as calling a zygote a person.
MP: Hey Steve, WB. Please stay with us on this! I'd generally agree with your opinion although I don't think it is, nor is it healthy to resolve it as such a black and white opinion. I would also quibble about the use of "rights" language and about the failure to acknowledge the man's choice in a concentual situation. But only because I think MoQ will speak about the issue on a different level. What I'm trying to do is sort out if MoQ can morally support a singular position, if so what is it, and more so does that shed any light on how to go about resolving it on the social level? Is an MoQ moral position on abortion we might extract any help at all? Or would it just end up being a great personal guide, but useless on a social level? I have faith [sniker] the MoQ is resilient enough to provide fundamental societal guidance. MP ---- "Don't believe everything you think." Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
