> [Platt]
> Don't have to. Pirsig does an excellent job on both counts. You can't even
> start to answer the questions he poses other than by the tautology of
> "Life 
> survives because it survives."  
> 
> [Krimel]
> Exactly as I predicted. He can't explain and can't defend it.

[Platt]
Krimel either refuses to read Pirsig's explanation or can't understand it. 

[Krimel]
I have read and understand it well. On several occasions I have offered
detailed critiques of its errors. For example his obviously ridiculous
statement: 

"The question is: Then why does nature reverse this process? What on earth
causes the inorganic compounds to go the other way? It isn't the sun's
energy. We just saw what the sun's energy did. It has to be something else.
What is it?"

Nature does not reverse processes. As everyone from the Egyptians to the
Aztecs have noticed, sunlight is the source and driving force of all life on
earth.

But again you offer silly statements that reflect the poverty of your grasp
on these matters. But thanks for once again demonstrating to all assembled
here how clueless you are.




Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to