[Willblake2] > Hi all, > > Let me first say that I carry the burden of scientific > training, Ph.D. and all. That means full indoctrination. > > I read, below, scientific facts thrown about as though they > were truths. The earth is 5 billion years old! Did you measure > this, or are you parroting somebody's opinion? Oh, it has > been proven. Please explain to me that proof. Is it all based on > assumptions? Science is a convention, that seems to provide > some predictability to our lives. That predictability comes true > simply because the cause and effect are supporting each other, > like a closed logical circle, no other reason. 1 + 1= 2. What does > that mean? Absolutely nothing more than a convention. Neuronal > firings that are shared amongst people. The more people that > have similar neuronal firings (or patterns), the more meaningful > it seems to be. Why? Because we like company. > > It is my opinion that science describes that which is considered > outside of us; this includes the brain as described by science. > Spirituality describes that which is within ourselves. It is my belief > that which is within is much greater than what is outside. (It could > also > be said that the world we create is within (and I don't mean within > the brain)). The "rules" for describing spirituality are very different > from the rules of science. There is no cause-effect. If we could > transmit > feelings directly (no thoughts or words in between) it would be > much easier to convey spirituality. Instead we are left with > the scientific (logical) tool of language. > > Science has sacrificed that within for that outside. For every > word concerning experience in English, there are forty in Sanskrit. It > is > because of this obsession with that which is outside, that we > find no real meaning or satisfaction or truth. How could there be? > Science has taken much away. There is no balance. > > It seems that the more detailed we make this outside, the more > dominant it becomes, until it is all. What an illusion! > > The real war is between that which is within, and that which is outside > (without). > > I think this has something to do with MoQ... > > Willblake2
I'm with you Willblake2. The cosmos exhibits an inner will to be better. That's the message of the MoQ. Platt Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
