Marsha, The Darwinists are hard pressed to explain hobbits. The theory is now challenged from within. Wonders never cease.
Platt On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:02 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > A Tiny Hominid With No Place on the Family Tree > > ... > > If the hobbit is a throwback to much earlier hominids, scientists said, > reverse evolution would be the most far-fetched explanation. Dr. Jungers, a > paleoanthropologist who organized the symposium, said there were no known > examples of mammals becoming significantly reduced in size and anatomy as a > consequence of reverting to an ancestral form. > > ... > > http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/28/science/28hobbit.html?_r=1&8dpc > > > > > > . > _____________ > > Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars......... > . > . > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
