Hi Platt,
I am not trying to discredit Evolution. To me it means 'change' and
that seems correct. A more precise definition than that is a very
interesting theory, with a few anomalies, and which already has a
history of itself changing. Intelligent Design is not credible
science. My concern is that science is blindly followed without an
understanding of its danger points, and I am relieved that it is
being challenged. It should be properly evaluated and monitored by
all citizens.
Marsha
At 05:59 PM 4/28/2009, you wrote:
Marsha,
The Darwinists are hard pressed to explain hobbits. The theory is now
challenged from within. Wonders never cease.
Platt
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:02 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> A Tiny Hominid With No Place on the Family Tree
>
> ...
>
> If the hobbit is a throwback to much earlier hominids, scientists said,
> reverse evolution would be the most far-fetched explanation. Dr. Jungers, a
> paleoanthropologist who organized the symposium, said there were no known
> examples of mammals becoming significantly reduced in size and anatomy as a
> consequence of reverting to an ancestral form.
>
> ...
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/28/science/28hobbit.html?_r=1&8dpc
>
>
>
>
>
> .
> _____________
>
> Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
> .
> .
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
.
_____________
Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
