http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_generation
________________________________ From: MarshaV <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 9:10:19 AM Subject: Re: [MD] A Tiny Hominid With No Place on the Family Tree Steve, From what I have heard the theory of evolution has "evolved" a lot from the theory that Darwin presented. Yes? And are you saying that there are no other theories challenging Evolution but Intelligent Design? None? Marsha At 08:15 AM 4/29/2009, you wrote: >Hi Platt, > >Yes, all science has are theories. Darwinism is the only viable one on >evolution. >I read the article. I don't see anything there to suggest that this >finding is a challenge to Darwinism. It looks like a lot of scientists >are exicited about this finding. There is nothing more exiciting to >scientists than finding that contradict current thinking. But it >doesn't sound like they think that Darwinism needs rethinking, just >the families trees. > >Best, >Steve > > > > >On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Platt Holden <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey Steve, > > > > Quote from the article: > > > > The possibilities get curiouser and > curiouser, said William L. Jungers of Stony > > Brook > University<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/s/state_university_of_new_york_at_stony_brook/index.html?inline=nyt-org>, > > making hobbits “the black swan of paleontology — totally unpredicted and > > inexplicable.” > > > > The discovery of these little people doesn't > support another theory but does > > raise questions about the current one. See the full article at: > > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/28/science/28hobbit.html?_r=1&hpw > > > > As for science having no theories, isn't that all they have? > > > > Regards, > > Platt > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Steven Peterson > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> Platt: > >> > >> Platt said: > >> > The Darwinists are hard pressed to explain hobbits. The theory is now > >> > challenged from within. Wonders never cease. > >> > >> Steve: > >> Can you explain how this finding puts evolutionary theory into > >> question or how it lends support to some other theory? (As far as I > >> know, there are no other scientific theories.) > >> > >> Regards, > >> Steve > >> > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > > Archives: > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > > >Moq_Discuss mailing list >Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >Archives: >http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ . _____________ Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars......... . . Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
