Hey Steve, Quote from the article:
The possibilities get curiouser and curiouser, said William L. Jungers of Stony Brook University<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/s/state_university_of_new_york_at_stony_brook/index.html?inline=nyt-org>, making hobbits “the black swan of paleontology — totally unpredicted and inexplicable.” The discovery of these little people doesn't support another theory but does raise questions about the current one. See the full article at: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/28/science/28hobbit.html?_r=1&hpw As for science having no theories, isn't that all they have? Regards, Platt On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Steven Peterson <[email protected]>wrote: > Platt: > > Platt said: > > The Darwinists are hard pressed to explain hobbits. The theory is now > > challenged from within. Wonders never cease. > > Steve: > Can you explain how this finding puts evolutionary theory into > question or how it lends support to some other theory? (As far as I > know, there are no other scientific theories.) > > Regards, > Steve > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
