[Andrew] Your talmudic approach to this discussion is tedious to say the least. Your obsession with naughty terms is grating.
[Arlo] Talmudic approach? Oh gee, whassamatter? Am I not speak in sweepingly broad terms? Am I actually not letting people get away with making empty claims? Obsession with naughty terms? Too funny. Such as? Are you cringing reading the words "retard" or "nigger"? Does that bother you? Can you maybe use a brain cell and figure out why I'm using them? I mean, I gather that everyone else has been smart enough to figure that out. Someone else can write that people should be able to hire and fire other people based on their skin color, another makes ridiculously empty claims about PC being some "leftist evil" assault on wholesome conservatives. And you're coming after me?? Wow. Just wow. [Andrew] Your ad hominem unrelenting. [Arlo] Examples? Against who? Platt?? Too funny. [Andrew] Your logic flawed. Your style insipid. ARLO, YOU'RE FIRED! [Arlo] Wow. Such big claims. Can you back any up? Where is my "logic flawed"? Can you back that up? Here's an idea, Andrew, just a small one. You may want to actuallly try supporting what you say. Any idiot can write what you just did. I mean, if you want to go the route of unsupported name calling, be my guest, you can call me all the names you want. I don't care. But, if you can't back up what you say, then, Andrew, well... that speaks for itself. And it may mean you need to go back and actually look up what "ad hominem" means. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
