> [Krimel] > In fact Pirsig, mistakenly I think, asserts that the social level is > entirely human as well. > I think it was unfortunate that Pirsig termed the third level as "social".
Craig If he would have called it the "institutional level", he could have made his point without getting it mistaken for the biological activities of bees & ants (our Professor, excepted). [Krimel] Or if he were really as up on anthropology as he claims to be, he could have used "culture'. But he didn't and the result is confusion. But it is not as though his other levels make any more sense. Organic chemistry is at the inorganic level and who the heck knows what the intellectual level is supposed to be? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
