Bo:
This pertains to Pirsig's (silly) "Quality as Dynamic and the MOQ as
static". The "Quality=Reality" postulate is part and parcel of the MOQ,
because it does not mean a thing without the static counterpoint. To
speak of a Quality independent of the MOQ is both impossible and
counterproductive,
Ron:
I think I see why you have trouble with this Bo, when
you stated that dynamic quality is correlative to it's
static counterpoint, you are on the money and that
is what is trying to be stated. Dynamic and Static
are words for experience, these words are Quality
too but are defined as static because they have
universal meaning and are symbolic of expereince
they are describing.
MoQ then is Quality but it is defined as static from the standpoint
of the universal understanding of concepts, it is dynamic in the
particular experience.
enough!
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
