> [Nick previously] > A civil society can agree upon such parks and limits of kills. It > doesn't need > a monopoly government to have this happen. > > [Arlo] > Who would enforce what this civil society agrees upon? How would it pay for > such enforcement?
The law with individuals to back them up with enforce it. Voluntary pay by those that want the park, not forced taxes. > [Nick previously] > Again non-sequitur, nobody said that would happen, so, you're off topic. > > [Arlo] > Not at all. I said the government, in symbiosis, provides roads. You said the > "free market" could provides better. Hence private ownership of roads, how do > you think the property owner will recoup the expense of building a road on his > land? Tolls. Nick: Of course tolls, but that doesn't mean you'll be paying a toll every minute. There would be no demand for that realistically. So you're off-topic and being emotive, irrational. Arlo: > If not, then explain to me how the "free market" could provide a > better roadway infrastructure than the evil coercive government. Nick: Most roads now are made by private companies that are contracted out. Nobody forces people to make roads. The government is the coercive middle-man not doing the actual roadwork. Nick -- Be Yourself @ mail.com! Choose From 200+ Email Addresses Get a Free Account at www.mail.com Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
