On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:01 AM, X Acto <[email protected]> wrote:

> Platt,
> You forget that Horse owns and operates this website and censors how he
> sees fit.
> He is not an agent of the government and the MoQ or the discuss are not
> government
> intitutions and therefore he has the right to not tolerate this sort of
> violent rhetoric if he so
> chooses. I think he has been very tolerant and liberal in his decisions, I
> doubt you would offer
> the same graces.
>

Platt
Of course Horse can block Nick's posts if he so chooses. Who is to stop him?
I was appealing to a principle which Horse has chosen to ignore. If you
don't think the principle applies in this case, fine. I will  always defend
your right to express your views.

Ron
You despise socialism but apeal to a socialist ideal of "social rights"

Platt
The right I appeal to is an "individual" right, not "social." Societies
don't speak.

Ron
Horse is excercising
his individual choice and you should respect that being a purveyeor of
individualism.

Platt
I do. I also have expressed my gratitude for his management of this site
without cost to us beneficiaries many times. Just as I respect his right as
manager to muzzle Nick, I respect the right of Nick to participate
here under the intellectual right of free speech. There seems to be a hidden
assumption among some here that they have a monopoly on "goodness" and
"truth." I consider such arrogance not only low quality but dangerous.

Ron
Natural laws are a collective ideal. "all men are created equal" I think Ham
would have
issue with that little endorsement of collectivist propaganda.

Platt
That phrase sanctions the primacy of the individual, not the collective.














________________________________
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>

> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 9:35:27 AM
> Subject: Re: [MD] An Observation From An Outsider
>
> On 9 Jun 2009 at 14:08, Louise Pryor wrote:
>
> > Americans who hate their country, hate it with the naive ferocity of
> those
> > who have no idea how the rest of the world operates. Having lived in a
> > socialist monarchy, under a military dictatorship, in a tropical
> paradise,
> > and in a democracy, I have a different view of America. The hope my
> father
> > had, when he brought us here (legally) was of America as the land of
> > promise. "In America anyone can be anything they want to be" was his
> > understanding. He came here with $400 in his pocket and the promise of a
> > job. And because what he believed is true, he found what he was looking
> for.
> >
> > I grant that the American government is not perfect, and may be far from
> > what the founding fathers had in mind, but it still has a foundation of
> > freedom, whereby Nick can declare his "rights to personal property" -
> right
> > out loud - with very little actual threat that anyone will come in and
> take
> > it away from him - and plenty of recourse if anyone did.
> >
> > "Rights to personal property", and "individual rights", are not something
> > commonly recognized world wide. The rest of the world sees Americans, in
> > general, as greedy,  spoiled children.
> >
> > "I have my rights, sir, and I'm telling you, I intend to go on doing just
> > what I do!" (the Onceler to the Lorax, Dr. Seuss)
> >
> > Lu
>
> Well said, Lu. Unfortunately we see the socialist mind at work in the
> overt censorship of Nick whose presence here has been summarily
> taken away from him by fiat while those who blasphemed him as a
> "whack-job," "paranoid violent nutcase," and "time for your meds again"
> are given a free pass. Although I find ad hominem attacks a sign that
> the attacker has nothing of value to say, I would never attempt to take
> away his right to say it. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes
> expressed the essence of free speech as etched in the U.S.
> Constitution:
>
> "If there is any principle of the Constitution that more imperatively calls
> for attachment than any other it is the principle of free thought--not free
> thought for those who agree with us but freedom for the thought we
> hate."
>
> It's clear that many Europeans and others around the world do not share
> this quintessential American value.
>
> Platt
>
>  Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to