Hi Platt,
The physicists are stuck using our s/o language so it is difficult to
interpret exactly what they mean when they explain the theories and
experiments to non-physicists, but it sounds very much like the
standard model of particle physics represents actual independent
entities. But at other times it sounds like it's all equations. For
instance, there is a possibility if the Higgs Boson is not found the
standard model of particle physics may start to fall apart because of
the number of infinities that appear in the equations. At the
moment, they're assuming its existence. But even within the model as
is, there seems to be a lot of manipulation going on to avoid, at all
cost, infinities.
Honestly, if it wasn't labeled as Science, it most certainly could be
'scorned' as mysticism.
Marsha
At 03:40 PM 6/22/2009, you wrote:
Marsha,
Right. That's my understanding, also. The evidence is seen in an
oscilloscope, cloud chamber, photographic plate and/or other man-made
particle detector instrument, never directly.
On 22 Jun 2009 at 13:59, MarshaV wrote:
>
> Platt,
>
> I'm really a dummy about this stuff, but it is my understanding that
> there is no particle seen, but only evidence from the event, for
> instance on a photographic plate, tracks in a cloud or bubble chamber, etc.
>
>
> Marsha
>
>
>
>
> At 01:37 PM 6/22/2009, you wrote:
> >Marsha,
> >
> >When a particle suddenly for no good reason appears on an
> >oscilloscope and then disappears.
> >
> >Platt
> >
> >
> >
> >On 22 Jun 2009 at 13:22, MarshaV wrote:
> >
> > > At 12:23 PM 6/22/2009, you wrote:
> > > >Hi Andre,
> > > >
> > > >Agree. Quantum responses are the same as DQ responses only at a
> > lower level
> > > >than you and I experience DQ responses are instantaneous,
reverberating
> > > >throughout the cosmos, and all emerge from the creative energy of DQ.
> > >
> > >
> > > Gee Platt, would you please explain a Quantum response?
> > >
> > >
> > > Marsha
> > >
> > >
> > > >Usually, static patterns manage to deflect DQ. But every once in
> > awhile, DQ
> > > >breaks through, showing itself in what we regard as lucky
> > > >coincidences, called "oops" because SOM science is
completely baffled by
> > > >their occurrence
> > > >
> > > >Platt
> > > >
> > > >On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Andre Broersen
> > > ><[email protected]>wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > Whilst still on the recovery trail I was wondering: what is the
> > > > > relationship
> > > > > between the quantum level and DQ?
> > > > >
> > > > > If quantum forces are said to 'respond' to DQ along the
> > mathematical laws
> > > > > laid down by quantum physics and if it can be argued further
> > that all is
> > > > > 'made up' of quantum forces then it follows that we, as with
> > the universe,
> > > > > respond to DQ instantaneously.( shooting 'through the levels'
> > if you like
> > > > > with 'their' associated response mechanisms) To wit, I do not
> > experience
> > > > > something first in my little finger, then in my brain,
then in my right
> > > > > foot
> > > > > etc etc. I would have thought it is an instantaneous
quality response
> > > > > reverberating through me and the universe..
> > > > >
> > > > > Or am I way, way of here ( if I am I can always blame the remnant
> > > > > side-effects of my medication)?
> > > > >
> > > > > Peace and regards
> > > > > Andre
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
_____________
"He who neglects the present moment throws away all he has."
(Friedrich von Schiller)
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
