As long as you think Pirsig is correct about ultimate reality, your writing MOQ writing? Otherwise, it's SOM writing? Is that the difference?
Platt On 22 Jun 2009 at 19:56, [email protected] wrote: > > > > [Platt] > > Pirisg's explication of the MOQ is written in SOM. > > [Craig, previously] > > If you're referring to "Lila", you're way off. It is the best example of > > MoQ writing. > > > [Platt] > > Throughout Lila, the author (subject) talks about Lila, (object), Rigel > > (object) > > the Giant (object), good dogs (objects) and many other things and events > > (objects). > > > True enough. If Pirsig had said these subjects & objects were the ultimate > reality, > > it would have been SOM writing. But as he made it clear, that QUALITY is the > ultimate reality, > > it is MoQ writing. > Basic MoQ. > > Craig > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
