Hi Marsha,

Marsha:
... To me 'Man is the measure of all
things.' means that Protagoras, and the early Sophists, were relativists and RMP agrees with them. Not the "source" of all things, but the measurer of
all things, meaning measured relative to their experience of them,
participators. From Wiki: 'The term (relativism) often refers to truth relativism, which is the doctrine that there are no absolute truths, i.e., that truth is always relative to some particular frame of reference, such as a language or a culture.' And not an ethical relativism where anything goes, but one where man should participate using intelligence to determine
the best course of action, arĂȘte.

Steve:
I think we should always defend ourselves against the charge of relativism since it is used as an epithet and a way of dismissing someone without having to address their arguments. While we can like the slogan "man is the measure of all things" because it captures the notion that unlike theists and rationalists we are not looking for a great, non-human, ahistorical power to tell us right from wrong, we also still deny being relativists because we deny the absolute- relative distinctions on the same groups that we deny the objective- subjective distinction. It's the same thing as not wanting to be called a subjectivist.

Pirsig later brings back the terms subjective and objective without their metaphysical baggage where subjective is just taken to mean social and intellectual patterns or "things that are hard to get agreement about" and objective is taken to mean inorganic and biological patterns or "things that are easy to get agreement about." Absolute and relative could be retooled in the same way, but I still think that we should avoid using such terms because doing so implies accepting an SOM premise that we don't accept. We can just say that some morals are easy to get agreement on and others not so much, and we can argue our case for the morality of our position. When someone has to say "well, some things are just wrong" or "it's wrong because God says so," we don't have to take them to be absolutists so much as having exhausted their conversational resources for making a case for their point of view.

Best,
Steve


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to