Dave, I would never claim to be able to think backwards, so I have no speculation about a primary cause. But my answer to Ham, ' The previous value event.' was based on my experience of meditation. Would that be goofy, Dave?
Marsha -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of david buchanan Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 3:14 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [MD] The percolating SOL Ham said: There remains, however, the question: What IS the cause of Value? dmb says: When someone answers that, I'll ask about the cause of the cause of value. Then somebody can ask about the cause of the cause of the cause of value. And so on, forever. Just as in the case of theology's "prime mover" or "first cause", it's a goofy, goofy fake problem. _________________________________________________________________ Get back to school stuff for them and cashback for you. http://www.bing.com/cashback?form=MSHYCB&publ=WLHMTAG&crea=TEXT_MSHYCB_BackT oSchool_Cashback_BTSCashback_1x1 Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
