On 9/8/09 11:55 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote: > I still have no idea where Andre's "slightly worried" is > directed, especially as it was in response to a post I sent. Do you have > any idea? 180-degree Zen and 360-degree Zen seems to be some kind of > abstract, symbolic Zen language. > > Marsha
I think what Pirsig is referring to with his circle and X's in the interview is basically restating the ancient Zen Ox herding Pictures. Go to http://www.jaysquare.com/ljohnson/ox-herding.html scroll down to the individual pictures. Place an "x" at the bottom of the first circle and proceed to step/picture 2,3,4..etc if you mark your progress in one direction around (in tenths) the circle when you get to ten you're right back where you started. But if you fully experienced each step the journey should have been enlightening. You however are not necessarily "Enlightened". As a practical matter to the practicing Buddhist you don't necessarily proceed regularly, in a timely manner from step to step. Backsliding is a universal truth. While we know that the ZMM Pirsig was interested and pursued eastern philosophy it would be interesting to know whether he was an intellectual studying Buddhism or practicing Buddhist at that time. And if practicing whether it started before or after his "breakdown". Dave. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
