On 9/15/09 10:39 PM, "John Carl" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I believe that the MoQ teaches that while Quality is undefinable as a > concept, it is an apprehensible experience. In other words, Quality can > only be defined in experience. This experience is all the precision > needed for morality. > Hi John and all, Logic requires the formulation for 1 for a description of morality rather than ³experience.² An experiential morality denies the advances in scientific exploration. If 1 is defined then 2 is greater than 1. The difficulty of evolution is that the undefined comes in different flavors and 1/0 though not popular indicates that there is more than one definition of 1. Pirsig likes 4 flavors for evolution. Esoteric literature sees 7 flavors for evolution. Whatever the number, the level of evolution becomes the basis for a new 1, which adds logic to the experience of morality rather than experience alone.. Joe >> >> >> >> Hi John and all, >> >> Imho in a DQ/SQ metaphysics there will always be something undefined in our >> knowledge. SOM proposed that the undefined was found in S. Does that mean >> that I can¹t be held responsible for what I am doing? Morality requires an >> evolutionary environment for precision. >> > > > Joe, > > I believe that the MoQ teaches that while Quality is undefinable as a > concept, it is an apprehensible experience. In other words, Quality can > only be defined in experience. This experience is all the precision > needed for morality. > > > John, humming along > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
