[Platt]
So much for the nonsense that "everything changes." Once dead, always dead.
[Arlo]
Still struggling with linguistic paradox, are you? We are back to the
"mathematical definition of randomness"... The patterns that
comprised the "person" continue to change... the atoms continue to
move, join, break apart... in a few billion years they will be
stretched across the universe... there is not one part of the
"person" that does not continue to change in some way... it may not
change the way *you* hope, but they continue to change nonetheless...
What's funny is that your argument here is "since time does not move
backwards (that we can seemingly perceive), therefore some things are
permanent"...
Consider a star exploding... you can say with the highest probablity
based on our observations that "that star was it was" will never
exist again... This is not an argument disproving that "nothing
changes", because the pattern we perceived in a past time will likely
not exist in the same way in the future. In fact, Platt, it is indeed
proof that "everything changes".
Thanks for your supportive example. I am really sorry you are
struggling with this hard. Keep at it, you may get it one day.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
