Hi all, This notion of quality being undefinable and only an experience is all a bunch of semantic nonsense!
Like the rule not to worship idols. You have to worship the real thing... A definition is an experience! Where do you draw the line at what is experience and what isn't? Reading these posts is an experience. When I think of the definition of water, that is an experience. Show me some definition that is not an experience. Labeling something as undefinable is a definition, and that definition is an experience. When you define Quality, that is an experience. Dividing reality up into definitions and experience is pure nonsense and doesn't lead anywhere. It is phantom reasoning through semantics. Cheers, Willblake2 On Sep 15, 2009, at 10:39:25 PM, "John Carl" <[email protected]> wrote: From: "John Carl" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [MD] Uncertainty Date: September 15, 2009 10:39:25 PM PDT To: [email protected] > > > > Hi John and all, > > Imho in a DQ/SQ metaphysics there will always be something undefined in our > knowledge. SOM proposed that the undefined was found in S. Does that mean > that I can¹t be held responsible for what I am doing? Morality requires an > evolutionary environment for precision. > Joe, I believe that the MoQ teaches that while Quality is undefinable as a concept, it is an apprehensible experience. In other words, Quality can only be defined in experience. This experience is all the precision needed for morality. John, humming along Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
