Arlo 16 Sep. you wrote:
> Of course you do, Bo. Which is why I rarely bother to try to talk to > you. As soon as someone doesn't bow at the altar of Bo, you dismiss > them as being somehow "SOM". As for "lead balloonish", one has only > to read your response to me. Ai yi yi.. > So like Arlo said before, why do you even bother asking him what he > thinks, since he is so poorly informed, so woefully inadequate in > his "take", so horribly mired in that dreadful "SOM" that only Bo > has overcome (well, and those who agree with Bo, to be sure)? I asked about your opinion on the said quote (that IMO confirms both the S/O-intellect and the MOQ a meta-level) but like the Cardinal who refused to look into Galileo's telescope you stick to your preconceived opinion. Don't think I don't know that there are other parts that contradicts it, but when Pirsig writes freely it pops up naturally - like the unexpected "particle" in a physicist's equation - yet when directly asked he denies it ... and confirms it, just to secure the ambiguity. Bodvar Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
