[Craig]
Nope, "in/completeness" doesn't work either. When I named my cat
"Schatze", I named the real complete cat that, not some part of her.
I could have named some part of her Schatze, but then I would have
had to come up with another name for the complete cat. No one ever
does this. (It's bad enough she thinks her name means "food".)
[Arlo]
Sorry Craig, I am pretty sure that the statement "the Allah that can
be named is not the real Allah" does not refer to simply providing a
phonetic marker like "Joe" or "Bob". I am, again, certain that the
use of "naming" in that statement is meant to refer to "defining".
Pirsig's quote is indeed relevant, since it says the exact same thing.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
