Bodvar: Good morning Andre Andre: Good evening Bodvar,You say:
..."many of the issues" not the SOL that I'm aware of is not accepted/agreed upon ...except Marsha who have seen that it is the only interpretation that makes the MOQ a new metaphysics, not merely another ruminating of SOM. I want to take it one step at a time and ask you as few questions possible, (per post). Question One: When you say: 'The only way to understand the MoQ is by accepting that intellect is the S/O aggregate. What do you mean? Objects referring to the inorganic/organic (patternd) level and subjects referring to the social/intellectual (patterned) level? Or good old objects referring to 'matter' (in MoQ terms the inorganic level) and subjects referring to 'mind' (in MoQ terms the intellectual level). Answer to Q1: by the S/O aggregate I mean.................................. . Second question: What is the relationship of 'intellect' to the MoQ intellectual level? Answer to Q2: the relationship between intellect and the MoQ intellectual level is....................................................................... . Bodvar, this may seem to be belittling but is not meant that way. Please be precise and clear. We all want to comprehend what your understanding and experience of the MoQ is. It has obviously made a deep impact on the way you experience your life. Dear Bodvar...please, please, please...keep it simple and concise. Andre (assuming the role of Torquemada...not the guinea pig). Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
