Bodvar:
Then existence's fundamental divide is "Non-conceptual/conceptual"
not DQ/SQ, or are these identical? Pirsig seems to think so from his
"Quality/MOQ" super-metaphysics that overrides the MOQ. And further
everything is "intellectual" - must be if both SOM and MOQ are
intellectual patterns. All container logic - and logic generally - is
jettisoned. Thanks but no thanks, I'm no "mystic".
Ron:
What you refuse to admit is that "logic" is
a necessity of SOM. One that is left behind with
the relegation of SOM to it's "S/O" status.
There is no MoQ "logic" for the Quality level
is out of intellect, right? thats what is supposed
to make your SOL so practicle right? subject-
object logic. But SOL has a inherent flaw one
MoQ tries to resolve by naming expereince
as the cause of subjects and objects. MoQ
states that they both are static they both are
conceptual, Hopefully SOL keeps this in mind
that it's a useful concept and not reality.
The Q understanding is that all understanding
is this way and that term we use, "reality" is
contextual and relative to SOM understanding.
We can not say what DQ is, therefore how may it be split?
it has no limits or definitions, how may it be divided?
It is mystical,
how else could it be?
If you adhere to logic
and shun the mystic
you are not of the
Q-understanding.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
