Andre, What kind of a statement is "The MoQ has made it very clear how it regards/ exposes the values of your persuasion and the MoQ is not impressed." Did the MoQ tell you it wasn't impressed?
Marsha -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 3:36 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [MD] SOM's defect comes home to roost On 2 Dec 2009 at 19:43, Andre Broersen wrote: > Platt to Andre: > By contrast you are enlightened, open-mnded, sophisticated, nuanced, > pragmatic, tolerant, flexible, charitable, reasonable and unbiased. > > Yes, of course. In your mind you've become another Phaedrus. > > I think it best to ignore an egomaniac. > > Andre: > Hi Platt, I really think that you are ignoring, or not really > understanding, one of many, very basic MoQ values. > I am not going to sort those out for you. You have to do that yourself. Hi Andre, I really think that if you are going to make an accusation like that you ought to back it up with evidence. > I have also, and, over the years not the only one, that your political > persuasion prevents you from reaping the full benefits of the MoQ. > This is a choice you make. But please do not pollute your political > persuasion with the MoQ. The MoQ has made it very clear how it > regards/ exposes the values of your persuasion and the MoQ is not > impressed. It is immorality pur sang! Again, an assertion without evidence. > I am only a combination of static PoV's capable of responding to Quality. > > The other thing Mr. Pirsig has always stressed is that the importance > of the influence of Oriental 'mysticism' in the MoQ should not be > underestimated. It gets you to the essence of it. Again, no evidence. > (By the way Platt, by creating a 'group' out of you, I mean to bypass > the person. There are many like you. Once again, and I have said this > before, this is not a personal attack. It is attempting an exposure/ > debunking of the SOM patterns you so vehemently defend and seem to > represent...this is delaying/undermining the growth of the > MoQ...imho). Your opinion should be supported with evidence. So long as that's lacking I don't see how you expect me to take your interpretations of the MOQ seriously. Regards, Platt Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
