Hello Andre, A RMP quote from the Copleston paper, "The MOQ supports both conservatism and liberalism at the same time. Freedom and order are contradictory but both are necessary at the same time." But I was more interested in what seemed not just an objectification of the MoQ in your statement, but a personification of the MoQ. Your use of the phrase, "the MoQ is not impressed" just hit me as a very odd statement. Maybe it was the post being read so close after reading "Platty want a cracker?". Marsha
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andre Broersen Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 5:20 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [MD] SOM's defect comes home to roost Marsha to Andre: What kind of a statement is "The MoQ has made it very clear how it regards/ exposes the values of your persuasion and the MoQ is not impressed." Did the MoQ tell you it wasn't impressed? Andre: Hi Marsha, good of you to be back. The answer to you query can be found in LILA, Chapter 17, p 225. When Phaedrus uses expressions such as ' conservatives ...trumpeting about virtues of free enterprise are normally just supporting their own self-interest. They are just doing the usual cover-up... '. I would suggest that that analysis in MoQ terms is considered low quality and therefore doesn't impress. The use of the word 'just' in this context (apart from the trumpeting, self- interest, and cover-up bits) is telling. Kind regards Andre Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
