[John]
The idea that climate scientist are doing this for money, I find...
um... what's that word? Specious? Yeah, I think that's the word.
[Arlo]
How is the motive between the "climate scientists" who promote global
warming and the "climate scientists" who deny global warming
different? Does one have ulterior, evil, take-over-the-world motives,
while the other is simply a lone, noble voice trying to get "truth" out?
Its funny how people who think differently are always advancing some
devious, ulterior motive, while those who think the same are just
being honest and noble.
[John]
But something more too or why would so many scientists line up behind
a rather bizarre idea with no logical foundation?
[Arlo]
Because it is not wholly bizarre, and has some logical foundation.
Oh, I agree, I am no "sky is falling" proponent. But to think that
all these people, from all over the world, are simply part of an
anti-liberty cabal, well...
And see that's the problem, John. Its either a "bizarre, illogical
idea" backed by freedom-hating, money-loving, immoral "scientists",
or its "unassailable prophecy" demanding that unless I get rid of my
F150 "the world will end TOMORROW!"... Maybe, just maybe, the truth
is somewhere in between... Naaahhhh.... The Holy War is so much enjoyable...
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
