Hi Marsha,

Yea I get that.  Be careful however, because as the Tao states,
The one gives rise to the two which gives rise to the four which
gives rise to the ten thousand things.  I am paraphrasing of 
course but then everything I have read about it, is paraphrasing,
because I do not read Chinese.

Mark

On Dec 3, 2009, at 1:54:04 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
From:   MarshaV <[email protected]>
Subject:    Re: [MD] SOM's defect comes home to roost
Date:   December 3, 2009 1:54:04 PM PST
To: [email protected]

Hi Mark,

I'm sorry, the word 'nature' had me confused. There is Quality, unpatterned
experience and patterned experience; I am not other than Quality.


Marsha



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of markhsmit
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 3:44 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [MD] SOM's defect comes home to roost

Hi Marsh,
I'm not sure what your understanding is.  You answered my 
question of a previous post, that of the relationship between
Nature and Quality.  In your opinion they are not the same.
The point I was trying to make is that I do not agree with the
notion that there is Nature or Quality that is separate from us.
Our intelligence is a small portion of Nature, which makes
Nature intelligent.  If we have purpose, or an objective, then
Nature does.  I believe in the Buddhist tradition, that the "I"
does not exist.  However, I typically use I according to its
accepted understanding as my brain/body.  Same with We.

Yes we are static patterns in the same way a tornado is.

That was my intent.

Mark
On Dec 3, 2009, at 1:25:38 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
From: MarshaV <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [MD] SOM's defect comes home to roost
Date: December 3, 2009 1:25:38 AM PST
To: [email protected]

Hi Mark,

I do not recollect 'nature' being used as a synonym for 'Quality'. 'Nature'
and 'We' area both static patterns of value, and I understand neither to be
objects or objective. And also I find the singular 'I' and the collective
'We' to both be anomolies. Have I misunderstood the intent of your post?


Marsha



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of markhsmit
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 11:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [MD] SOM's defect comes home to roost

Hi Marsha,

If I may provide a perhaps unwanted intrusion with an answer.

Of course it is an objective nature.  We are part of it and we claim
to be objective.  We are not an anomaly, something separate from
Nature, we are Nature.  We are proof that Nature is objective.

Mark

On Dec 2, 2009, at 5:51:46 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
From: MarshaV <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [MD] SOM's defect comes home to roost
Date: December 2, 2009 5:51:46 AM PST
To: [email protected]
Greetings Ron,

Do you mean an objective nature at work? 


Marsha 





-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of X Acto
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 8:23 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [MD] SOM's defect comes home to roost

Mark,
I guess suicideal tendancies are nature at work, hell
everything is nature at work. Perhaps I get the absurd idea
of conservation from working in civil engineering where
the illusion is by proper design and resource management
more people may live in an area for longer periods of time
and sustain a comfortable standard of living conditions.
You seem to prefer the days of dumping raw sewage in the streets
and the widespread plague of diseases that accompany it.

Yes, environmentalists are typically assholes. Arlo and I
acknowledged this sad aspect too. They go after the little
stuff and let the big problems walk on by.
close minded self righteous idiots..
..But if all you want to do is get yer kicks before this shithouse
goes up in flames, then you must not have any children.

-Ron


 


----- Original Message ----
From: markhsmit <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tue, December 1, 2009 11:34:55 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] SOM's defect comes home to roost

[Mark]
I would tend to disagree with you X.  Environmentalists not only think
that things man made are different from the environment, but they
believe that man has control over it.  Humans will rise and fall
just like the dinosaurs, and do you know who is responsible for
that?  Not Humans, but the environment.  We are nature at work.


[X Acto]
Well ya see Arlo, the thread line is "SOM's defect comes home to roost"
SOM's defect is that it thinks humans are sepreate and distinct from their
environment....now....environmentalism goes against the grain of SOM
since it asserts humans are indeed part of the environment and we better
manage 
our practices better or we're going to poison ourselves with our own waste,
the only way I can figure environmentalism can be deadly to humans is if
it is taken to extreme ie, killing humans to save the environment which is
just
as ludicris as exhausting all resources and poisoning ourselves. Platt may
have an economic gripe that environmentalism impinges on capitalistic profit
but environmentalism opens up a greater diversity in the market place by
creating
a new marketable industry that creates wealth.
Frankly, I really do not see how one can square this up. Dishonesty,
perhaps.
But dishonesty in the same vein in that our parents or the church lied to us
to 
keep us out of trouble, for our own well being. If he really wants to pick
knits.
But that brings up the the question of what is true? since there is no
objective
truth, what exactly does he base his claims on, the willful falsification of
data?
Gov. been doing that since the dawn of time. He demands honosty from Gov.
now?  the Gov. lies! , of all possible outcomes I would think, lying to us
in sake
preserving our world and our species is a lie I can live with. Just do not
see the 
downside, unless Platt likes soylent green.



----- Original Message ----
From: Arlo Bensinger <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tue, December 1, 2009 10:26:13 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] SOM's defect comes home to roost

[Ron]
What are the deadly consequences of environmentalism?

[Arlo]
Haven't you been following the "news"? Death camps! Enslavement! The End of
Liberty! Tyranny! One World Guvmint! Dogs and cats living together!! Soylent
Green is people!!!


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/




Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/




Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to