Hey Platt,

Well I was sitting waiting for my car to get an alignment today,I picked up
our local paper and a found real good column by Jonah Goldberg that made me
think of you and I thought I'd share it with you.

<goog_1260491054178>
http://www.theunion.com/article/20091210/OPINION_NATIONAL/912099985/1026/OPINION&parentprofile=1056


"Going back to U.S. Steel and the railroads, the story of big business in
America is often as not the story of fat cats rigging the system. And the
story of progressivism is the same tale. The New Deal codes were mostly
written by big business to squeeze out smaller competitors. The progressives
fought for these reforms on the grounds that it's easier to steer a few
giant oxen than a thousand cats.

But health care is the most troubling example of the trend. Washington Post
columnist Robert Samuelson notes that while everyone has been debating the
government takeover of health care, what's really transpired is health
care's takeover of government — thanks to what he calls the “medical
industrial complex.” Already 1 in 4 federal outlays are for health care;
government pays, directly or indirectly, for half of all health care costs;
and the entire industry is heavily regulated. Obama's answer to this state
of affairs is more — much more — of the same, on the phantasmagorical
grounds that it will cut costs.

My biggest objection is not to what isn't true about the claim that the
right is the handmaiden to big business, it's to what is true. Too many
Republicans think being pro-business is the same as being pro-market. They
defend the status quo against bad reforms and think they've defended
economic freedom. The status quo stinks. And the sooner Republicans learn
that, the sooner they'll deserve to win again."

But then, Platt, while looking up that quote online, I read today's column
online by the same author, and I figured you'd really, really appreciate it
so I'm smacking you with one column and stroking you with his next:

http://www.theunion.com/article/20091203/OPINION_NATIONAL/912029991/1026&parentprofile=1056

The crusade against moral hypocrisy necessarily hits conservatives harder,
not because conservatives are more immoral but because they uphold morality
more publicly, making them richer targets. The left aims much of its
moralizing at moralizing itself -- "thou shalt not judge." Meanwhile, the
right focuses on the oldies but goodies -- adultery, drug use, etc. I think
we're right to uphold a standard even if we sometimes fail to live up to it.

What I don't think we hear enough about is intellectual hypocrisy. What's
that? Well, if moral hypocrisy is saying what values people should live by
while failing to follow them yourself, intellectual hypocrisy is believing
you are smart enough to run other peoples' lives when you can barely run
your own.

I know many smart liberals for whom no idea is too complex, no concept or
organizational flow chart too hard to grasp. They want government to take
over this, run that, manage some other things, and in all cases put people
exactly like them in charge of pretty much everything. Many are geniuses,
with SAT scores so high you could get a bloody nose just looking at them.

But you wouldn't ask one to run a car wash.

------------

He goes on.... his last paragraph reinforces your point, practically
verbatim:

"Moral hypocrisy is still worth exposing, I guess. But we are living in a
moment when revealing intellectual hypocrisy should take precedence. A J.P.
Morgan chart reprinted on the "Enterprise Blog" shows that less than 10
percent of President Obama's Cabinet has private-sector experience, the
least of any Cabinet in a century. From the stimulus to health care reform
and cap-and-trade, Washington is now run by people who think they know how
to run everything, when in reality they can barely run anything."

Cheers,

John the even handed
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to