Hey John,

What is "communal action?" Is that anything like community organizing?

Speaking of "egoistic selfish desires," Mother Theresa was a shining
example. What
she did filled her heart with joy.

Your friend,
Platt


On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:04 PM, John Carl <[email protected]> wrote:

> >
> >
> > "My personal feeling is that this is how any further improvement of the
> > world will be done: by individuals making Quality decisions and that´s
> all.
> >
>
> Well personal feelings aside, we know intellectually that the only way the
> world ever improves is by communal action.  There isn't a darn thing that
> changes when one lone individual makes Quality decisions, unless those
> decisions redirect a social relationship towards Quality.  The society can
> be quite small, but world-class improvements have to be performed by
> world-class societies.
>
>
>
> > God, I don´t want to have any more enthusiasm for big programs full of
> > social planning for big masses of people that leave individual Quality
> > out.
>
>
> Yeah, me neither.  But sometimes you can't help yourself.  Enthusiasm
> bubbles up from beyond, evidently.  Where does enthusiasm come from?  Same
> place as hypothesis's I guess, and over which we have as little control.
>
>
>
> > These can be left alone for a while.
>
>
> Great, sure. you bet.  How long?  Forever and ever?  I mean, this was
> written when?  I remember there was a lot of this enthusiasm floating
> around
> back in the 70's for big social programs, mostly leading nowhere.  So does
> that mean we can just do away with it completely?  Because it seems to me,
> Mr. Pirsig, that since those days your individualistic stance has gained
> wide hold, and the concommitant drop in communal interaction has just
> driven
> people to ever more isolation and getting their cultural needs met through
> mediated-techno placebos which makes 'em more isolated, which drives them
> more inward, which....
>
>
>
> > There´s a place for them
>
>
>
> I definitely agree!
>
>
>
> > but
> > they´ve got to be built on a foundation of Quality within the individuals
> > involved.
>
>
>
> I agree there too.  But since that is an individualistic effort - Quality
> within individuals involved - it makes the whole thing hopeless because of
> the problems I outlined above.  I mean, I'm perfectly content to stand back
> and let individuals evolve their own Quality.  But the dark powers in
> charge
> seem to want to degrade individuals in order to get them ignorant and
> pliable and fond of McDonalds and happy in WalMart.  So the bad guys
> recruit
> and the good guys shut up.  How long do you think this pattern can continue
> before we're all totally screwed?
>
>
>
> > We´ve had that individual Quality in the past, exploited it as a
> > natural resource without knowing it, and now it´s just about depleted.
> > Everyone´s just about out of gumption. And I think it´s about time to
> > return to the rebuilding of this American resource...individual worth.
> >
>
>
> There used to be a great pride in the basis of morality for capitalism.
>  Our
> enemy,the  godless communists, failed, we claimed, through exactly this
> means of moral superiority.  Adam Smith's theories only work when populated
> by moral people.  Morals were our strength, and you'd think a book that
> enquired into them would be a valuable resource, but unfortunately, Rigel
> had a point when he claimed that freeing up people to think about their
> morals and choose them has had some surprisingly negative effects.  Mostly
> what they decide makes a Quality decision, is that which rewards the
> egoistic selfish desires.
>
> I don't blame ZAMM for that movement, I blame the social media (tv) not the
> intellectual (books).
>
>
>
>
> > There are political reactionaries who´ve been saying something close to
> > this for years. I´m not one of them, but to the extent they´re talking
> > about
> > real individual worth and not just an excuse for giving more money to
> > the rich, they´re right. We do need a return to individual integrity,
> self-
> > reliance and old-fashioned gumption. We really do."
> >
>
>
> This gumption and real individual worth are created by interaction with
> community - a social context and by stories told to the young.
>
> The current generation has been given over to central programming from
> birth, and since this generation can't even imagine the world you and I are
> old enough to remember, and since this generation is suckled at an
> electronic teat that has NO motivation for teaching self-reliance,
> integrity
> or gumption, (who'd buy cosmetics for men if we did that?) I'd say we need
> new words to help us in our crucial hour.
>
>
> > "Self-reliance." Not a word you often hear from the ruling elite
> > (Hollywood, politicians, academics and the major media) these days.
> >
> > Platt
>
>
>  There ya go.  Platt's got it exactly right.  Just add in  big business
> board rooms as part of the evil consortium, and you've got the whole
> picture.   If you describe Liberal and Conservative, I see a two-headed
> giant that every time  one is attacked,  the other just gets stronger and
> the giant gets bigger.
>
> John Carl the fan of the Grinch
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to