Hi again Mary

19 Dec. you said :(to me)

> Your words sparked a thought.  Having never been a religious person,
> I stand outside the window looking in at all the goings-on.  I've
> certainly been invited to the party, but don't feel comfortable
> attending.

> > [Bo] the new light the MOQ throws on Jesus' "attack" on the Mosaic
> > tradition. then this. [Bo] Christendom has moved away from its
> > Semitic roots and become more and more "intellectual"

> Once again I find myself having to look things up.

You won't find anything resembling this interpretation anywhere, it's
all based on the MOQ (my interpretation of it that is) but it brings
so many bits of the great puzzle into place.

> Mosaic Tradition:  the laws (beginning with the Ten Commandments)
> that God gave to the Israelites through Moses; it includes many
> rules of religious observance given in the first five books of the
> Old Testament.

Yes, but even Moses is late in this context. all It began with 
monotheism which began with the Israelite godhead "competing" with
other tribe's ditto and (according to their book) won out. The point
is the Jewish hybris of first declaring one god and then that the
creator of the universe was THEIR god who had an agreement with them -
the covenant. 

> Well, hmmm.  That dashes my thought, but I will soldier on with it
> anyway. The word "mosaic" sparked in my mind the idea of multiple
> gods.
>  Now I realize this is not at all what you meant ......

MOQ's point is that monotheism (which in intellect's (SOM's) view is
Goodness ousting Evil) was a mere refinement of the social-
mythological reality, one that since has resisted all intellectual
"assaults" on the "social level in that (Semitic) culture. 

To explain this strange statement: After the Exodus the Jews 
represented no "force", but Semitism continued with Islam that 
emerged as a buffer against Christendom that expanded into the Arab
world after becoming a Roman religion. So Islam now fights "Western
Values" unto self-sacrifice. As soon as something resembling democracy
emerges it is struck down. 

Don't be fooled by the state Israel being in conflict with half the
Muslim world, the state is secular but note that the orthodox Jews
despise it and refuse to yield to secular laws if these don't fit the
"Covenant" and the ultra orthodox hate Israel as much as the
Palestinians.and travels to Iran to participate in "conferences"  

>  ....... but consider this The Intellectual Level would not exist
>  were
> it not for Monotheism. 

Coming down from the "mountain". The intellectual level would not
exist without the social , but IMO monotheism was not the dynamic
social pattern that "took off on a purpose of its own" to form
intellect, rather a deadlock.   

> My idea is that when there were many gods, each with their own area
> of specialty, and each requiring appeasement and worship to get
> things to go your way, it was impossible to 'think outside the god
> box' and give basic cause and effect it's due.

The MOQ does not support multi-theism or any kind of -isms at all, yet
the intellectual level (skepticism regarding social patterns like
religions) is its highest static good.  .   

> If you've got 100 gods all acting on a whim in your life, you do not
> have free will.  If you do not have free will, you cannot believe
> that anything much you do to affect your situation is going to
> matter in the end.  

Exactly, this describes the old social mythological reality
splendidly, the "free will" lacking totally. But this is only a
handicap viewed from intellect, it's an enormous freedom too - perhaps
bliss - why Phaedrus looked back on the social  AretĂȘ reality as
Quality itself. And these days this is Islam's attraction. I exempt
Christendom because it is so intellectualized that it does not offer
much  

> If you do not believe you can affect anything, you will not
> look for answers.  If you do not look for answers, you will not view
> things as an intellectual problem to be solved.  If you do not do
> that, you are not operating at the intellectual level.  You are
> stuck.

EXACTLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>  Was the Intellectual Level born in the Garden of Eden - of a woman?
> (he he)  Couldn't resist that.

The Eden myth is existence's biological-social transition IMO, leaving
an even greater state of bliss of a-morality. 


The inveterate lecturer

Bodvar 






Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to