Hi Bo, On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:01 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Andre, All. > > 13 Jan.you wrote: > > Steve to me I presume: >> > Since you equate the MOQ with reality, fitting all of reality into the >> > intellectual level is a problem for you. But accpording to the MOQ, the >> > MOQ is not reality. Quality is reality. The Metaphysics of Quality is >> > words about reality (Quality) rather than reality (Quality) itself.
Bo: > Steve's unwillingness to understand is monumental. "...fitting all of > reality into the intellectual level" My foot! Intellect is a MOQ level thus > by no twist of (norma)l logic can the MOQ be an intellectual pattern. Steve: Come on, Bo. "Unwillingness to understand"? our argument is with Pirsig, not with me. You know full well that Pirsig has specifically said on numerous occasions that the MOQ is an intellectual pattern. For example, in LC he writes: "79.Since in the MOQ all divisions of Quality are static it follows that high and low are subdivisions of static quality. “Static” and “Dynamic” are also subdivisions of static quality, since the MOQ is itself a static intellectual pattern of Quality." Regards, Steve Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
