Mary to all: The MoQ says (if you want to put it in these kind of terms) that the "ultimate reality" is not fixed in space or time, has no predefined goal in mind, and cannot even definitively say _in advance_ that any one thing is "better" than any other. There is no "ultimate reality" that is always and forever True. Quality makes it up as it goes along (or discovers it, or acknowledges it, or notices it). It is all relative, depends on your point of view, and what level your point of view arises from. That's the beauty of it. Things achieve the status of a static latch in a level because they are _valued_ by that level. They may be the best thing since sliced bread for that level, but the worst thing ever for all the others - meanwhile, _all_ the levels coexist within us and are all operating simultaneously. How cool is that? Personally, I prefer it to worshiping an ultimate reality.
Andre: Hi Mary (again) I think you are pretty right about this. Ham doesn't like illogical stuff. He wants the comfort of pre-defined origins and ultimate realities in a neatly ordered logical way. The MoQ is different from that. This is what makes it a unique document. Cheers Andre Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
